Martin Heidegger observed in his essay 'The Question Concerning Technology' that "whether we passionately affirm or deny it" we "remain unfree and chained to technology." The basic premise of this argument was that people infrequently question the technology which they use, and critically evaluate the moral and ethical implications of that technologies which they use on a day to day basis even less frequently. As a result, people become slaves to their technology (or as Kurt Vonnegut would say "tools of their tools"). The essay has aged well. In our day it is unlikely that many people know enough about the technology they use each day to repair it in the event of a malfunction, and even fewer know how to use the pieces of complex machinery they own for more than a few essential functions. For those of you who think that I am unfair in this assessment, I invite you to tell me how your television, microwave oven, refrigerator, and computer function, and what you would do in the event of a malfunction. If you are anything like me, you would probably go looking for technical support which -- more often than not -- is completely useless and more than a little bit frustrating.
I bring this up because during my run to the Acme (a 1.4 mile roundtrip) I began to wonder about my running shoes. What made them work? How were they made? Why were they only good for 350-500 miles depending on the surface they were most frequently used on? I was sad to realize that I could not answer even the most basic question about how the laces were made or how the shoes were put together beyond a simple "people in a developing country would probably know the answer." This answer, of course, amounts to an abandonment of the initial question since it is very unlikely that I will ever visit a manufacturing plant in a developing country. Fortunately, however, there is another option: Using the internet (another piece of technology which I understand on a basic level but whose architecture and finer points I must admit more illiteracy than I would care to) to find an answer.
As it turns out, the reason why my shoes are cushioned and stable is that they use ethylene vinyl acetate -- a sort of foam which, although not harmful to your health, is found in cigarettes. According to the American Academy of Podiatric Sports Medicine, the type of shoe I bought is one which is designed for stability. I was unnecessarily happy about this little bit of information since it indicated that the salesperson at Bryn Mawr Running Co. was not lying to me when he sold me the shoe. While I still cannot claim knowledge of how my shoe was made (or of how ethylene vinyl acetate is manufactured), I can say that I know more today than I did yesterday about the process of shoe-making.
Heidegger's point, it seems, is one we would do well to take into consideration. Technology is not always benign -- and not understanding the implications of our use of technology can harm us. I hate to belabor such a basic point, but it is one which I believe we would all do well to remember.
As for the actual running, today was the first time in a long time that I was able to run more than a mile without being forced to stop. I do not regret my time at Villanova -- or my affinity for Birkenstock sandals -- but it is undeniable that, during my time there, I lost much of the cardiovascular fitness that I had worked so hard to gain during my time in high school. Too much thinking and not enough running I suppose.
No comments:
Post a Comment